After reading multiple reports and even more fan reaction via story comments and message boards posts, the new agreement, which also commits $130 million in stadium renovations, seems to have divided the fanbase on what the terms of the deal really mean. (photo: Eammon, Flickr)
There are two general schools of thought: a positive one and a negative one.
Positive thinking:
- It's a win simply because it guarantees the Bills stay in Buffalo for at least seven more years. The $400 million is enough to deter even a prospective owner to move the team. We'll worry about the rest later. Just enjoy it.
- The $130 million is a good thing because it will help preserve the Ralph while maintaining the atmosphere that has made it so endearing over the years.
- The $130 million means that the team/county/state is banking on Band-Aiding the Ralph while deciding on and executing an in-region move and/or a new stadium build. In fact, the Bills announced the creation of a "New Stadium Working Group" that will help keep the Bills in Buffalo.
- Everything else aside, seven years should be long enough for Los Angeles (or another potential moving destination), if it will in fact get a team soon, to have already scooped up another franchise.
Negative thinking:
- The seven-year aspect is questionable, as Ralph Wilson sadly might not outlive the lease, which would mean a new owner, given that Wilson himself doesn't sell before he passes, could have ample time to plan a move. Even if said owner doesn't make a move in time at the eighth year, he/she could use the next three to chart an escape.
- $130 million isn't enough to do much of anything with one of the rougher stadiums in the league, and the Band-Aid idea it just furthers the potential of a Bill-less Buffalo in a decade.
- Even if the Bills do stay in Buffalo, the stadium and temporary-fix atmosphere will continue to repel a better product on the field and a better fan experience.
Follow Nick @NickStDenis
Follow AFC East Daily @AFCEastDaily
